GRID K520 vs Tesla M2070 Q

When comparing GRID K520 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K520

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	20−22	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	21−24	6−7
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K520 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	50−55
QHD / 1440p	55−60	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
high / 768p	140−150	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	95−100	55−60
ultra / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	18−20	4−5
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	27−30	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	55−60	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	27−30	8−9
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	21−24
medium / 1080p	30−35	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	90−95	50−55
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	9−10
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	60−65	20−22
medium / 768p	35−40	12−14
high / 1080p	20−22	7−8
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1536	448
Core clock speed	745 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	32.14
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s	94 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares