GRID K520 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between GRID K520 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
GRID K520
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GRID K520 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |