FirePro M5950 vs GRID M10 8Q
When comparing FirePro M5950 and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 542% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 308 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4300 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5950 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 56% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 95% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 47% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |