FirePro M6000 vs GRID M10 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6000 and GRID M10 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6000 and GRID M10 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 283 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6000 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 33% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Heathrow | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |