FirePro M6100 vs GRID M10 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6100 and GRID M10 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6100 stacks up against GRID M10 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 67 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- FirePro M6100 and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6100 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 18% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 7% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Bonaire | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |