FirePro V7900 vs GRID M10 8Q
In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and GRID M10 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others GRID M10 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
GRID M10 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID M10 8Q has 49% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 308 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 12 mm longer, than GRID M10 8Q.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
190−200
medium / 768p
150−160
160−170
ultra / 1080p
75−80
85−90
QHD / 1440p
45−50
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
70−75
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−105
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
24−27
30−33
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro V7900.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
GRID M10 8Q
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Maxwell
Code name
Cayman
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
18 May 2016
Pipelines
1280
640
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
52.24
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
1,672 gflops
Length
279 mm
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
83.2 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price