FirePro W4190M vs GRID M10 8Q
When comparing FirePro W4190M and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 208 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 1200 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |