FirePro W7170M vs GRID M10 8Q
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID M10 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and GRID M10 8Q.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 310 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |