FireStream 9270 vs GRID M10 8Q

When comparing FireStream 9270 and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9270

GRID M10 8Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M10 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID M10 8Q has 40% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 283 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 1600 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	12−14
ultra / 1080p	2−3	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−12	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9270 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	190−200
medium / 768p	100−110	160−170
ultra / 1080p	50−55	85−90
QHD / 1440p	27−30	50−55
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	90−95
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 92% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	75−80
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	8−9
ultra / 1080p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	5−6	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	45−50
medium / 768p	14−16	30−33
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M10 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell
Code name	RV770	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	18 May 2016
Pipelines	800	640
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1033 MHz
Boost Clock		1306 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	52.24
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	1,672 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0

FireStream 9270 vs GRID M10 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares