GeForce 825M vs GRID M10 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 825M and GRID M10 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 825M and GRID M10 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 183 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1300% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK208 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |