GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID M10 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GRID M10 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against GRID M10 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 275% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 467 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 64 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |