GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GRID M10 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GRID M10 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against GRID M10 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GRID M10 8Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GRID M10 8Q has 40% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 254 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M10 8Q is 57 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 1192 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF114 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |