GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 950M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X