GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GRID M10 8Q
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 24 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |