GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 633 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 76% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 70% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 51% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 72% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 950M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395