GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - with Gen. 12 Xe.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - by 10 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 934 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 123% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID M10 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 12 Xe |
Code name | GM107 | iDG1LPDEV |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 31 October 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Check Price |