GRID M10 8Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4870. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4870. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4870 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 483 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4312 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Terascale 1 |
| Code name | GM107 | M98-XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 9 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 22.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 56.83 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |