GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 558 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |