GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro 5010M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 5010M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 5010M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 583 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3900 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 7% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |