GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GRID M10 8Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 433 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GRID M10 8Q is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3600 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 666% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 2400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 1.3 |