GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K4000M
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 433 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 7% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K4000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N14E-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 48.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |