GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K4200

In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID M10 8Q

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID M10 8Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 262 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID M10 8Q is 26 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 200 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−33
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	4−5	9−10
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 65% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	190−200	230−240
medium / 768p	160−170	200−210
ultra / 1080p	85−90	120−130
QHD / 1440p	50−55	100−105
4K / 2160p	30−33	55−60
high / 768p	120−130	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	85−90	110−120
ultra / 1080p	55−60	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	16−18	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	90−95	130−140
medium / 1080p	45−50	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 51% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
QHD / 1440p	7−8	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	70−75	95−100
high / 1080p	24−27	40−45
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	8−9	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	75−80
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	30−33	50−55
high / 1080p	16−18	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 68% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Quadro K4200
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 May 2016	22 July 2014
Pipelines	640	1344
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	784 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	87.81
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		119 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares