GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro M2000M
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M2000M.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M2000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 5 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 25% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1197 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |