GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 238 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 2800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 123% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID M10 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM107 | N19P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |