GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon 520
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon 520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon 520.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2950 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Oland |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Check Price |