GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon HD 4810
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GRID M10 8Q has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 504 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GRID M10 8Q is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV770 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 246 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |