GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon HD 6950M
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon HD 6950M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon HD 6950M.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon HD 6950M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 453 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon HD 6950M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Blackcomb Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 580 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 27.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |