GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |