GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 46% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |