GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 49 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 0% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |