GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R7 M270
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 208 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |