GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R7 M460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 49 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R7 M460 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Check Price |