GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R8 M365DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R8 M365DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 313 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 318% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |