GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 108 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 360% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |