GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R9 M365X

When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M365X.

GRID M10 8Q

Radeon R9 M365X Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:

Radeon R9 M365X Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4075 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	16−18
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M10 8Q and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	130−140
medium / 768p	160−170	110−120
ultra / 1080p	85−90	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	27−30
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	120−130	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	80−85
medium / 768p	85−90	55−60
ultra / 1080p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	8−9
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	90−95	60−65
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−12
QHD / 1440p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	75−80	50−55
medium / 768p	70−75	45−50
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	6−7
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	8−9	4−5
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−12	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	24−27
medium / 768p	30−33	16−18
high / 1080p	16−18	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN
Code name	GM107	Tropo
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 May 2016	6 May 2015
Pipelines	640	640
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	925 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	37.00
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	1,184 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10
		Check Price

GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon R9 M365X

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares