GRID M10 8Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 459 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- GRID M10 8Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2068 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |