FirePro M4000 vs GRID M6 8Q
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GRID M6 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GRID M6 8Q.
GRID M6 8Q
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 203% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 122 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 54% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 87% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 69.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |