FirePro M5100 vs GRID M6 8Q
In this comparison between FirePro M5100 and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5100 will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 3 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- FirePro M5100 and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 56% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Venus | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 69.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |