FirePro V5800 vs GRID M6 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GRID M6 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GRID M6 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GRID M6 8Q
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GRID M6 8Q has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 32 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 123% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Juniper | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 722 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |