GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID M6 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and GRID M6 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GRID M6 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 778 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 160M and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 160M and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 64 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 722 MHz |
Transistor count | 505 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |