GeForce GTX 260 vs GRID M6 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260 and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260 will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 82% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 888 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 520 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
75−80
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
70−75
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GRID M6 8Q
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
GT200
GM204
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
30 August 2015
Pipelines
192
1536
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
722 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
69.31
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
2,218 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
160.4 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Check Price
