GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M6 8Q

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 690 and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 690 will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 690 Check Price

GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 690	GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5	8 GB
Display Connectors	3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 690 has 200% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 690.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 690 is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 690 is 193 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
GeForce GTX 690 and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 690 is 996 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	5−6
4K / 2160p	10−11	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	35−40	8−9
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 690 and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	220−230
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	75−80
4K / 2160p	70−75	40−45
high / 768p	210−220	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GeForce GTX 690 and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Fortnite is 77% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−12
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	140−150	95−100
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	70−75	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	130−140	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 690 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID M6 8Q.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 690	GRID M6 8Q
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 May 2012	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1536	1536
Core clock speed	915 MHz	722 MHz
Boost Clock	1019 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	234 billion/sec	69.31
Floating-point performance	2x 3,130 gflops	2,218 gflops
Length	11.0" (27.9 cm)
Memory bus width	512-bit (256-bit per GPU)	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.2
CUDA cores	3072
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	4 displays
HDMI	Yes (via dongle)
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
3D Blu-Ray	+
3D Gaming	+
3D Vision Live	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	156 Mh/s
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares