GeForce GTX 765M vs GRID M6 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 765M and GRID M6 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and GRID M6 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 128 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 765M and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14-GE | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 722 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |