GeForce MX250 vs GRID M6 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID M6 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX250 stacks up against GRID M6 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 796 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce MX250. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G2 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 722 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |