GRID K260Q vs GRID M6 8Q
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GRID M6 8Q
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 125% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 23 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID K260Q and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 26% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M6 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 722 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |