GRID K520 vs GRID M6 8Q

When comparing GRID K520 and GRID M6 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and GRID M6 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K520

GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

	GRID K520	GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 has 125% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 23 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
GRID K520 and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	5−6
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	220−230
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	100−110	110−120
QHD / 1440p	55−60	75−80
4K / 2160p	30−35	40−45
high / 768p	140−150	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	110−120
medium / 1080p	55−60	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 6% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−12
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	80−85	85−90
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID M6 8Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	65−70
medium / 768p	35−40	40−45
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID M6 8Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	GRID M6 8Q
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1536	1536
Core clock speed	745 MHz	722 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	69.31
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	2,218 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s

GRID K520 vs GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares