GRID M6 8Q vs HD Graphics 4400
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and HD Graphics 4400, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and HD Graphics 4400 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 522 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1750% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and HD Graphics 4400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | − |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 205% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than HD Graphics 4400. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | HD Graphics 4400 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 20 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 22.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 46 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |