GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Graphics 5100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Graphics 5100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M6 8Q stacks up against Iris Graphics 5100, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 522 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |