GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 422 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 190% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
| Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 10 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |