GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M6 8Q stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 24 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 422 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 87% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |